• nothing in nature has a "purpose" - traits have benefits or disadvantages, pretending there's a "purpose" for traits is an ID game that is logically nullified

--------------------------------

right. i meant in jason's version of god's grand plan. the purpose of the male orgasm is obvious. but why would a god who wants humans for no other purpose than to regenerate themselves to make more fans for Himself care if women get off? if women don't like to have the sex it takes to get impregnated, well, that's why we drag them back to our caves by their hair.

<< conversely it's why societies that stress sexual dominion / repression are materially backward compared to their egalitarian / sexually healthy counterparts. >>

That and the brute fact that the enormous amount of political and cultural repression it takes to run a society along such dog-kennel lines is enormously expensive, diverting energies and resources away as a matter of course from any kind of advancement in any area.

This repression must get bigger all the time, as the cultural/sexual police snout out more (and more arcane) offenses to feed the never-ending moral panic that pays their salaries. Such an order can't go forward and can't run in place, so its backwards they go, to the human level of places like Afghanistan and Mississippi.

Such precincts, it must be plain, cost humanity as a whole FAR more than they contribute. A suddenly Learyoid USA would create an interesting political and economic vacuum almost certainly ending in World Wars Three and Four.

Mid-30s?

Well, I suppose reaching your sexual peak (as a woman it's around age 32) probably gave it a boost, but I can't imagine all those years without multiple orgasms...all the more reason to enjoy it now, Enrika!

LOKI POSTED :With a man who actually finds it his prerogative to judge the creation of his God,

RESPONSE: The creation fell into partial corruption . Read the Genesis cosmogony carefully .

LOKI POSTED :I don't hink you have to pay much attention to any Biblical analysis he might offer.

RESPONSE: You are encouraging people to play fast and loose and NOT engage in careful exegesis .

LOKI POSTED :You're dealing with an intellect that can't spot the simple fallacies in its eructations;

RESPONSE: You relativists are the ones supporting fallacy .

LOKI POSTED :there's no point in trying to convey anything to J Leary beyond "get off my lawn or I'm calling the cops" or "if you try to talk to my child I will fucking kill you".

RESPONSE: Stay away from the kids, Loki . Keep your hardcore bondage pornography to yourself .Don't try and turn the young into sex positive "21 Century" misfits just because you are one, degenerate .

LOKI POSTED :He is literally unable to comprehend even the simplest argument, and incapable of formulating same. This is why he can earnestly expect you to believe that his values are -the- values. He will misuse the term "a priori" in an attempt to lend credence to his boldly naked and hilariously frothing insanity.

RESPONSE: It's no misuse . Again , you are part of the hipster crowd that rejects logic as "pedantic" so it is no suprise that you would take umbrage with a cogent use of the term a priori .

LOKI POSTED :He will be confused; he'll swear "no no no; it's perfectly acceptable for me to call all bisexuals 'filthy sleaze' and to blame my personal hatred on their inability to agree with me".

RESPONSE: Such value judgements are constructive criticism .

LOKI POSTED : Moral paragons like Lucy will comment on how polite and genteel he is, calling for the shaming of those who dare to express rage toward someone who has consistently sermonized for nothing short of the total dehumanization of all people he finds fault in

RESPONSE: Constructive criticism designed to call filth 'filth' is NOT dehumanizing .

LOKI POSTED :- because no matter how perverted his own notions of fault are, they are emanations from magical paradimensional perfection, which, somehow, he insists doesn't make him - and Lucy, of course - a ridiculous gibbering nazi.

RESPONSE: Contrary to the revisionist tripe we've been fed in much of academia and the mass media --the nazis were actually quasi-relativist . Like the Foucault and Richard Rorty crowd , nazi ideology in the main denied any meta-political criterion for value or utimate truth . Hitler apparently exhorted the masses in Germany to 'think with your blood' . The Aryan fraud was treated as sufficeint unto itself an meta-racial , meta-social criterion was denied .

It was the absolutist Jews who were killed by him and absolutist theologians like Dietrich Boenhoeffer who opposed him . It was relativist postmodernists like Paul de Mann in occupied France who were in league with the nazi regime .

How dare you compare the struggle for acceptance of the sexual swinging set with people who had a cause that counted for something that were killed by Hitler's crowd ---people like the monotheistic absolutist Jews , the trade unionists , the Greek soldiers who gave their lives rather than surrender to him when his armies poured into Greece , the students in the White Rose brotherhood that protested him on the campuses . They all had something more important to contribute , instead of mere sex kinks !

And keep the filthy language away from ladies like Lucy .