IT WAS FOR CHRISTIANS! THOSE WHO STARTED ALL THIS!

AND NOW YOU'RE DOING IT AGAIN, HIDING ALL YOUR EVIL SHIT UNDER THE BANNER OF OTHER PEOPLE'S MASTURBATION.

YOU WON'T EVER KNOW WHAT YOU WERE IF WE LEAVE YOU ALONE.

SHADOWS. UNRIGHTEOUS SHADOWS.

For you, now, Jesus is God. So then the Passion. Who with? Your evil. And it won't die. You want a fantasy reality where you can do anything you want, build it yourselves.

Humm .
You are a pioneer and exploring various and sundry ways to think wrongly ,

Don't even bother thinking , since you do so in such a lousy , vulgar, cretinuous, and spurious manner .

<< The guy obsfucates, equivocates, swerves specific questions which catch all generalities of a merely alleged sort >>

ROCKSTAR POSTED :But YOU do all that! I've been trying to get a definition of "postmodernism" out of you for weeks. All you've managed is a lot of rote slogans, changed subjects, personal attacks and lumpy word-salad put forward as philosophy, most of it unfocused, ill-disciplined, rambling and misspelled.

RESPONSE: On the contrary , what I have posted is far from ill-discplined or unfocused . The posts I've posted I've made sure to make quite pedantic ...since pedantry is good . I avoid equivocation in what I post like the plague , and avoid changed subjects . The definition for postmodernism will be coming VERY soon . This present night I'm rather sleepy from some medicine I took. Keep in mind also that though I was able to find a definition in Webster's unabridged for relativism (which postmodernism is a sub-type of) I was unable in Webster's unabridged 1913 edition to find a definition of poatmodernism so I'm going to check the online encyclopedia of Philosophy (even though postmodernism being a subtype of relativism , like all types of relativism is an ANTI-philosophy ) . Barring extenuating circumstances or coputer malfunctions I should present to you a definition of 'postmodernism' (the ideology I hate) before the present week is over .

<< he types out the fancy word "sophistry" >>

ROCKSTAR POSTED :A word you've likely heard before and is thus full of unpleasant associations.

RESPONSE: A term people of his ilk use as an open- ended , catch- all term to save face for avoiding questions they do not wish to give a specific answer for .

<< Present a lexical explanation >>

ROCKSTAR POSTED :Define "postmodernism", Jason. Again, I don't have to present J.F. Squat to someone who won't answer a simple question about a word you misuse so often. Moreover, you have no business demanding gigantic investments of time out of total strangers to school you on your many and manifest errors. This apart from giving nothing in return but abuse and stoneheaded demands to explain the explanation!

RESPONSE: The definition of postmodernism is coming very soon . The requests to explain the explanation are NOT stoneheaded . Requests to explain an explanation further are part of dialectic . That is what dialectical reasoning truly involves in the classical Greek sense of Parmenides, Socrates, and Plato, not the basterdized use of the term 'dialectic' that was made by Hegel (and I mention that not to disparage everything that Hegel wrote) .

ROCKSTAR POSTED :I swear, you have a sense of personal entitlement dwarfing that of any Beverly Hills matron or teenage mall-princess in the Valley...

RESPONSE: Would you accuse Parmenides and Socrates of personal entitlement, when they also used dialectic to get be people to explain the terms of an explanation, to a long elaborate length and, hence, probed by asking people for more and more elaboration of on what grounds they espoused something ?

<< don't like all those stuffy antiquated exhortations I make to linguistic precedent >>

ROCKSTAR POSTED :Present proof you ever did this. You've never made *any* I've ever heard and, since you insist on treating the English language like a two-dollar whore, such "exhortations" would be hypocritically out-of-place.

RESPONSE: Reference the exchange I had with Pinky, concerning the linguistic precedent for the word 'marriage' wherefore I explained that the term 'marriage' referred specifically to the union of a man and a woman. Also an exchange where I explained there were NO stipulations in the dictionary definition regarding the race or colour of the participants .

<< Chances are I have planted what is called a seed of doubt . It may take a while to come to full fruition . >>

ROCKSTAR POSTED :This is the cheapest, sorriest excuse for online trolling I've ever heard. Alongside that, online masturbation is almost dignified.

RESPONSE: On what grounds ?
ROCKSTAR POSTED :Chances are WAY better that all you've done is alienate people seeking God and you may well pay a heavy postmortem price for it.

RESPONSE : Not so. I have alienated people seeking mammon and the cheap thrills of sex which are just as crass as mammon .

ROCKSTAR POSTED :A man of God would plant seeds of faith instead.

RESPONSE: I have planted seeds of doubt *about evil activities* . As did the vehement , polemical, ideologues of Old Testament prophets who did not respect opinions but instead derided crass opinions with vehemence . A lesser fellow like me should at least emulate the policy of people kile Amos,Jeremiah, Zecheriah and co don't you think ?

Here at long last is a definition of postmodernism as well as some supplementary comments from another encyclopedia .

'Postmodernism was originally a reaction to modernism. Largely influenced by the Western European disillusionment induced by World War II, postmodernism refers to a cultural, intellectual, or artistic state lacking a clear central hierarchy or organizing principle and embodying extreme complexity, contradiction, ambiguity, diversity, interconnectedness or interreferentiality,[4] in a way that is often indistinguishable from a parody of itself.' WIKIPEDIA

Thus one can witness that postmodernism is an evil ideology , inasmuch as it prizes
NON-consistency/ ambiguity/ internal contradictions / fuzzy boundaries or lack of boundaries . It is thus opposed to epistemic virtue . It promotes epistemic incontinence . It is ANTI-philosophy , for as Rene Desdcartes explained philosophy is about , 'clear , distinct ideas .'

Here below are some notes from Encyclopedia .com which comment on poststructuralism which is another term for postmodernism .

'Poststructuralists such as those associated with the Yale School of academics in the 1970s deprived literary texts of subject authority ("the disappearance of the author"), coherence (texts are "de-centered"), and social reference ("there is nothing outside the text"). On the other hand, in poststructuralism, loss of authority also signified the positive alternative of reading as personal freedom ("re-creation"); Barthes wrote of the "pleasure of the text." In the Yale School, Geoffrey Hartman urged that the very indeterminacy of language empowered a creative criticism that broke the shackles of univocal meaning. '

So have I.

PINKY POSTED :Women can also experience a similar reaction to orgasm denial under extreme conditions - I have.

RESPONSE: Could you have been exposed to some food toxins or other enviromental toxins or allergens at the time, Pinky !