DAN BAN

topic posted Tue, June 24, 2008 - 9:15 PM by  Mr. M
Changeling, the mod of the COR tribe complained to TOU about Dan and they banned him from Tribe. Rumour has it he is back with a new alt or two and it should just be a matter of time before he reveals himself again. Perhaps he can threaten to kill gay people again then lie and say he meant if they tried to rape him. ( rolls eyes ) That guy is totally insane. I may be crazy. But he's potentially very dangerous in my opinion. Like truly f____ dangerous in the fundamentalist fanatical way. OH, my goodness!!!

BOINK!!!

Got any choice words Wendy? Please do enlighten and bless us all with yet more of your pathetic banal verbiage.
posted by:
Mr. M
SF Bay Area
  • Re: DAN BAN

    Wed, June 25, 2008 - 4:38 PM
    Ok, I think you are weak and a coward who hides behind ridiculous statements and rude language to make himself feel better.

    Also, I think Changeling is weak minded and an easily led automaton.

    And something you always seem to forget, but doesn't surprise me at all about people like you, is that Dan and I are not alike. I have plenty to say to him for teaching false doctrines and perverting the Word of God. I don't think God hates anyone, but Dan doesn't feel the same way. All it takes is a study of the Bible, particularly the NT, to learn that God doesn't hate homosexuals, and Jesus was a very tolerant individual who pointed out the hypocrisies of the "religious" leaders in order for us ALL to learn to live by what we preach. Dan seems to have missed this point.

    I don't lump you in with all homosexual men, thank goodness for them, so don't lump me in with hypocrites like Dan.
    • Re: DAN BAN

      Wed, June 25, 2008 - 6:54 PM
      Youre still a rude insulting bitch Wendy. Go fuck yourself. I'm responding to you. I don't go off and say the things I say to you to that many people. Just a few select assholes such as yourself.
    • Re: DAN BAN

      Fri, June 27, 2008 - 7:01 AM
      Wendy, why are you using big complicated words Marvin can't understand? Just pat him on his flat head and say "there, there" and then move on. Marvin is a jerk.

      Dan was an asshole and a loser, basically incapable of anything even remotely approaching reason. His stupidity will be missed.
      • Re: DAN BAN

        Sat, June 28, 2008 - 6:37 AM
        BD youve been a dick since I first met you long ago on here too. I've had very little interaction with you yet somehow youve determined whatever negative opinion of me youve developed is apparently some law that can never be changed. Either you don't pay much attention or youre just a bit of a troll. Or both. Surely I put even less stock in you than you do of me. But please do continue to perpetuate the pettiness. Whatever entertains you I suppose.
        • Re: DAN BAN

          Sat, June 28, 2008 - 5:15 PM
          Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of your life.
          • Re: DAN BAN

            Sun, June 29, 2008 - 8:23 AM
            Exactly. I was just thinking the same thing. You just can't let it die. More of the same. Blah blah blah..........
            • Re: DAN BAN

              Sun, June 29, 2008 - 10:58 AM
              You know, it's quite amusing. If you wanted it to die, you could simply stop responding to me. But alas, you enjoy this. You cannot control yourself, its pathological with you. You MUST respond. I love this. You start a thread of hate and now you are stuck with it. BWAHAHAHAHAHA! I am not even sure what you were trying to debate, or if you were just being a whiner.


              Sucks to be you!
              • Re: DAN BAN

                Sun, June 29, 2008 - 12:22 PM
                I'm not necessarily talking about a thread you stupid cunt. I'm talking about YOU. You can't post anything but negativity towards me. You are apparently incapable of it. So now that we've both established our disdain for each other there's not much point in repeating that a few more hundred times really. You think whatever stupid shit you think about me and I think youre a stupid bitch. It's just that fucking simple. Next.
                • Re: DAN BAN

                  Sun, June 29, 2008 - 5:44 PM
                  **Snicker!**

                  **Chortle!**

                  Just HAD to respond, heheheheheheheheh. So predictable.

                  OH yeah, expletive, expletive!
        • Re: DAN BAN

          Mon, July 21, 2008 - 5:16 AM
          <<BD youve been a dick since I first met you long ago on here too. I've had very little interaction with you yet somehow youve determined whatever negative opinion of me youve developed is apparently some law that can never be changed>>

          Actually thats BD's personality. Pretty much hes going to hate you unless you're a subordinate clone of himself.
    • Re: DAN BAN

      Thu, July 17, 2008 - 3:40 PM
      Oh Ms Wendy you are such a bigot!

      The hate you have spewed towards One because of Ones sexuality! You have also told One Jesus hates One because of Ones sexuality, Now you blow a diffrent turn. You are Such a Bigot Ms Wendy. Oh and if you were truly a christian you would not be here, shaming god.

      Mr M. Now it hate you more than I, It is able to ignore One, as it's hate has transferred to you.

      This is one bitter, hateful women. But then some of the most bitter, hatful, evil people stand under the Christian banner,

      I know God loves me more than you ms Wendy, and Jesus is yet to come, there is not such thing as the NT. Ask the Jews, they have been around much longer than Christians. Oh take away the NT, and you take away the Christain foundations.

      You are pure eveil, Ms Wendy. I know God love me more than you, and thats a fact!
      • Re: DAN BAN

        Thu, July 17, 2008 - 3:56 PM
        Oh poor delusional Patticakes.

        I have NEVER hated anyone one for their sexual preference (which is what I assume you mean when you say your sexuality), nor have I EVER claimed God hated anyone. I also don't believe this is a competition between human beings for God's love. That is the idea of a young child with no firm grasp on his self-worth. You are so delusional. I really do wish you would seek some professional help.
        • Re: DAN BAN

          Thu, July 17, 2008 - 7:13 PM
          You really don't seem to be capable of any response that isnt offensive Wendy.

          Pattison what is NT? Oh just figured it out. lol I was like "Wtf is NT?" Duh.
          • Re: DAN BAN

            Thu, July 17, 2008 - 8:53 PM
            Marvy, I have dealt with Patticakes for a long time. I have listened to his endless tirades about how women's vaginas were to blame for all the world's ills, how his momma raped his souls [sic] and so forth. The guy is a freak who seriously needs intensive treatment. But then, you are one to talk about being offensive. Every post you ever make is vile, filthy, and repulsive. So....Pot Kettle Marvy.
            • Re: DAN BAN

              Thu, July 17, 2008 - 9:04 PM
              "The guy is a freak who seriously needs intensive treatment. " <------- Hence offensive. I don't know Pattison that well but havent seen these types of posts from him so far. I have seen quite a bit of foulness from you however.

              Every post of mine is NOT vile filthy and repulsive. You apparently havent seen the other 95% of my posts. As I post things like such I post directed to you not so much. You are one of the special people that apparently require my attention & derision. You sure love to use that pot calling the kettle black bit. Keep on whipping that dead horse Wendy. Maybe one day you will WAKE UP. But I doubt it. You thrive on negativity. You need to feel superior to others. I get it. I'll try my best to ignore you more. Thanx for even further clarification.

              Cheers.
              • Re: DAN BAN

                Fri, July 18, 2008 - 12:34 AM
                "I don't know Pattison that well but havent seen these types of posts from him so far"

                Then you apparently haven't been paying attention.

                Ask him!

                Ask how he feels about the evils of women and how his mum raped his souls and all the other crap he spews.

                Ask him!
  • Re: DAN BAN

    Wed, June 25, 2008 - 8:15 PM
    Changeling isn't the only one who had the guts to do something about that pathetic sociopath.
  • Re: DAN BAN

    Thu, June 26, 2008 - 10:10 AM
    Thank god. Reasonable debate was impossible with that guy. I dont feel everyone needs to think like I do, and I know I am a radical nut in my own way, and I enjoy good lively discussion about things.
    • Re: DAN BAN

      Thu, July 3, 2008 - 7:31 AM
      Dan wasn't just the average troll. The guy was twisted, insulting, and was so convinced of his viewpoint of 'righteousness' that he was intellectually lazy, even when confronted with the facts.

      I've been an engineering geologist for over 20 years, and he insulted me and my profession (geology) with his "you aren't as qualified as a creationist PhD" attitude. That was a garbage attitude of the worst sort. He went out looking for trouble, joining such diverse tribes as "Ultra Darwinists", "Church of the Flying Sphaghetti Monster", "Evolution", and others he had no business in, taunting the members and provoking negative response.

      I'd love to meet the guy in Thunderdome in August, but he's too much of a coward to show his face outside his own peculiar 'zone of personal enlightenment'

      I left this tribe because of him, but now I'm back. All's well that ends well. Dan, rot in hell.
      • Re: DAN BAN

        Sun, July 6, 2008 - 6:27 PM
        Uhm, other than Tina Turner and Mel Gibson, I know nothing of what's beyond Thunderdome.....
        • Re: DAN BAN

          Sun, July 6, 2008 - 9:48 PM
          Wrong Thunderdome, Wendy. This one is for real. Two men enter, one man leaves. It's sponsored by the Deathguild on the Black Rock playa on a yearly basis. They start the contestants out in harnesses, giving them a push inwards towards each other, with foam bats. The crowd votes on the winner of the match. The winner stays to fight again, and the loser leaves the ring.

          Though I doubt that Dan would ever show at Burningman.
          • Re: DAN BAN

            Mon, July 7, 2008 - 6:32 PM
            HEhehe, I would never show up at Burning Man. I am not an artsy fartsy, sex crazed, polyamorous, drug user!


            Oh come on now, don't get your panties in a wad, you CANNOT tell me those folks aren't rampant at BM, because most of my friends who go there fit that bill to a freakin' T. You know I HAD to say it, I just HAD to! It's part of my nature. ;-)
            • Re: DAN BAN

              Mon, July 7, 2008 - 9:03 PM
              I don't think there's anything wrong with being "an artsy fartsy, sex crazed, polyamorous, drug user!" While that may be consensus among alot of Burners I think it would be a broadbased generalization to say all burners share the same "nature." I don't go because I don't have the luxury of the time and money it takes. And even if I did I may not go either. I have always felt that all that time, money, energy, ect..., would be better spent on other things that are more of a priority. Kind of like how I feel about the "gay community" and the difference between the "Gay Pride Parade" and the Aids Walk. Askewed priorities in my opinion. Or the cost of the war abroad. How many billions? That money could have served such better purposes here at home. I'm sure my opinions would probably not be popular with most burners. But they are still how I feel. Even though I've never been. Perhaps if I go sometime I'll feel differently but I doubt it. But I never say never. I think. : )
              • Re: DAN BAN

                Mon, July 7, 2008 - 9:27 PM
                If your time travel machine is working, BM is great. If you have to go in the present era, though, better to spend for some surrogate thing that happens in what many burners so pompously and callously call the "default" world (using the same predication for lack of empathy and surfeit of apathy that "born-again" pseudochristians dismiss the as the "corrupt earth" that is less important than a fantasy of of afterlife).

                BM was a great thing until it corporatized. It became precisely what its early participants sought to escape from, and then sold its brand to a mass of willing consumers. I see it as an orgy of waste and indolence which is the inevitable result of institutionalized decadence.

                SHAME on Burning Man: traitor and hypocrite. Douse The Man.
                • Re: DAN BAN

                  Tue, July 8, 2008 - 6:37 AM
                  "HEhehe, I would never show up at Burning Man. I am not an artsy fartsy, sex crazed, polyamorous, drug user! "

                  Nope, Wendy, and neither am I.

                  I'm there for community. If you're not about making a better community and by extension a better life for all of us I want absolutely nothing to do with you.

                  Larry Harvey's heard it all, too, from "sex party in the desert", to "hippie Woodstock lollapalooza". Burningman offers participants a good time, to be sure, but unless you're going there with the intent of following the 10 Principles of Burningman (including gifting, radical self-reliance, community, decommodification, leave no trace, etc..) you're not getting the point at all.

                  Wendy, it's great to be snarky. But if you're going to sit and snipe and be snarky about something about which you have no clue, I guess ignorance is its own best defense against enlightenment.

                  And Loki.......BM is still a great thing....if you go to a regional event.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: DAN BAN

                    Wed, July 9, 2008 - 11:35 PM
                    >And Loki.......BM is still a great thing....if you go to a regional event.<<

                    word that
                • Re: DAN BAN

                  Tue, July 8, 2008 - 7:06 AM
                  I've seen alot of burners with that us & them mentality. Like theyre better. It is very much like fundamentalist Christian bigotry. That's part of what turns me off too. Though I'm sure not all burners are the same. I could probably have fun there but I just dont have the time & money. Other priorities overide the BM for me.
                • Re: DAN BAN

                  Tue, July 8, 2008 - 4:44 PM
                  Loki, that's just like the Love Parade in Berlin. It used to be a wonderful thing, now it's just an excuse to get drunk and do drugs in public, wear hardly anything, have sex behind the buildings and in the park and you won't even believe the filth left behind after the festival is over. People see a radical new thing, want to "belong in a community" and then screw it up. That's just the way people are.


                  As for the people of Burning Man adhering to Tread Lightly as if they thought it up, well, you forget, I work for the government! They had no choice but to follow it or lose their permit! Willingly living up to a regulation does not a glorious event make.

                  www.nv.blm.gov/Winnemucca..._Man_EA.pdf
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: DAN BAN

                    Tue, July 8, 2008 - 8:56 PM
                    Berlin is not the Black Rock Playa.

                    I work for the government, too....and I know the difference between apples and oranges.

                    The comparison doesn't hold, Wendy. Sorry. The Love Parade hasn't started a whole series of events with the same goals and ends like Burningman has. If you've never attended a regional event, you don't know what you're talking about. I've attended regional events (note t he plural) long before I made the decision to go to the desert. As far as the conditions of the BLM permit go, I'm fully aware of them, and the efforts made by the community AND the DPW to go the distance to leave no trace after the event.
                    • Re: DAN BAN

                      Fri, July 18, 2008 - 12:41 AM
                      I've said it before:

                      I'd love to have a DPW-specific event. I'd have it in my backyard. There's room. We could hunt deer and distill corn liquor. I know all the cops around here. Treehouses and electric portajohn/floodlight transforming robots. A "Surlympics" with "glaring at yahoo dimwits", "50 yard PBR sprint", and "build something important out of this scrap wire after not sleeping" events...

                      sigh
                      • Re: DAN BAN

                        Fri, July 18, 2008 - 12:52 AM
                        Loki, this is what happens when you stay up late. It's almost 3 am here because I was so dang tired after work I fell asleep by 6pm. Now......I am freakin' wide awake.

                        Quite honestly, what you propose sounds interesting. Not sure what your acronyms stand for, but the sulyolympics and the dimwit glaring events sound awesome!

                        Not into drinking the corn squeezings, I get enough corn in my diet! But, I will help you to ........flavor it for sale, heheh. I gots me some tricks from the backwoods. You know, I am in east Texas along the Luzee Anna border for the summer. I have met some interesting people to say the least.
                        • Re: DAN BAN

                          Fri, July 18, 2008 - 6:08 AM
                          Wendy, just make sure that you partake of the best cuisine that the east Texas Gulf coast has to offer...the Cajun cuisine. Experiment with the hot sauces if you dare...you'll be glad you did.

                          For your consideration, the acronyms used are:

                          BLM - Bureau of Land Management - US government agency that administers land that's taxpayer owned

                          BRC = Black Rock City, Nevada. Ephemeral city of 50,000 that will arise from the desert floor in 4-5 weeks and will vanish leaving no trace by late October, as verified by BLM. The site of Burningman.

                          PBR = Pabst Blue Ribbon beer. Beer of choice for blue-collar workers and the DPW.

                          DPW = Division of Public Works, Black Rock City, Nevada. These are the volunteers and paid staff that put up and take down the Burningman event.
                      • Re: DAN BAN

                        Thu, July 24, 2008 - 7:19 AM
                        Loki,

                        here's a thought for you...they just had a burner event down south sponsored by what they call the 'Dirty Southern Burners', something called "Transformus". It might just work for some of next year's hoopla if they regain their Burningman affiliation.

                        Wierder things have happened.
                        • Re: DAN BAN

                          Tue, July 29, 2008 - 3:35 PM
                          I've been encouraged toward Transformus for years; I'll totally show up when they send my gamelan Hungryflower a full invite and maybe a nice scholarship. It's expensive to haul metallophones and gongs into the mountains - I'm haughty like that.

                          I went to BM 5 times (I think) - never paid once. Always worked like a bottled demon. You may have seen me with what's now Gamelan X chanting daily at center camp on my last visit in 2002 - I was camping with Opera that year. If you actually caught the opera itself you're one of the few that have had the pleasure of seeing my gargantuan balls.
                          • Re: DAN BAN

                            Tue, July 29, 2008 - 5:37 PM
                            Oh my lordy, your gargantuan balls?

                            Is that an innuendo that has absolutely nothing to do with your heuvos, or did you sport some supremely large cohones in the opera? Inquiring minds wanna know.
      • Re: DAN BAN

        Wed, July 23, 2008 - 1:34 AM
        >>>>Dan wasn't just the average troll. The guy was twisted, insulting, and was so convinced of his viewpoint of 'righteousness' that he was intellectually lazy, even when confronted with the facts. <<<<<

        Describes a few people in this tribe.
        When did this change from the "heated debate" tribe to "name calling" tribe?

        If you have a problem with somebody's post, either ignore them or address the issue. Name calling just makes you look ignorant and hateful and makes me feel like I'm in a Monty Python episode.

        Q: WHAT DO YOU WANT?
        M: Well, I was told outside that...
        Q: Don't give me that, you snotty-faced heap of parrot droppings!
        M: What?
        Q: Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type really makes me puke, you vacuous, coffee-nosed, maloderous, pervert!!!
        M: Look, I CAME HERE FOR AN ARGUMENT, I'm not going to just stand...!!
        Q: OH, oh I'm sorry, but this is abuse.
        M: Oh, I see, well, that explains it.
        Q: Ah yes, you want room 12A, Just along the corridor.
        M: Oh, Thank you very much. Sorry.
        Q: Not at all.
        M: Thank You.
        (Under his breath) Stupid git!!
        • Re: DAN BAN

          Wed, July 23, 2008 - 7:17 AM
          I dont think calling someone a dick is ignorant or hateful. If someone acts like an asshole I call them one if I feel like it and don't care what anyone else might think. If theyre paying attention they will understand the response. It's not like people just start calling people assholes for no reason. Some people see the use of foul language differently. I aint no fuckin' Puritan yo. Enjoy your pedestal.

          Cheers.
        • Re: DAN BAN

          Wed, July 23, 2008 - 4:03 PM
          Pssssst, Lia, you are talking to a room full of brick walls okay.

          They would much rather name call and cuss then actually debate a topic.

          Think about it Lia, this is a thread entirely devoted to complaining about Dan Dan the Troll Man, according to Marvy.
          • Re: DAN BAN

            Wed, July 23, 2008 - 6:43 PM
            Wendy you post the same banal shit all the time. So keep pretending youre something more than you are and above or better than others. I laugh AT you everytime you post. What the fuck have you debated? And if you happen to look at the front page of the tribe you will see this......

            "Free-for-all about anything under the sun... Say what you want, when you want...

            FREEDOM OF SPEECH!"

            IDIOT!!!

            Hence I say, yet again, FUCK YOU YOU STUPID BITCH CUNT!!!
            Thank you.
            Goodbye.
            • Re: DAN BAN

              Thu, July 24, 2008 - 4:38 PM
              Poor delusional Marvy.

              I never said I thought I was better than anyone, or that I was above anyone. Nor do I think that.

              I never said you couldn't say something.

              I never tried to deny you your 'FREEDOM OF SPEECH", hehehehehehehhehe, oh my.

              You really need to take a break from the internet for about a month, then come back with a fresh perspective.

              This is too funny.