Advertisement
Conceptual containment
The philosopher Immanuel Kant was the first to use the terms "analytic" and "synthetic" to divide propositions into types. Kant introduces the analytic/synthetic distinction in the Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1998, A6-7/B10-11). There, he restricts his attention to affirmative subject-predicate judgments, and defines "analytic proposition" and "synthetic proposition" as follows:
analytic proposition: a proposition whose predicate concept is contained in its subject concept
synthetic proposition: a proposition whose predicate concept is not contained in its subject concept
Examples of analytic propositions, on Kant's definition, include:
"All bachelors are unmarried."
"All triangles have three sides."
Kant's own example is:
"All bodies are extended," i.e. take up space. (A7/B11)
Each of these is an affirmative subject-predicate judgment, and in each, the predicate concept is contained with the subject concept. The concept "bachelor" contains the concepts "unmarried"; the concept "unmarried" is part of the definition of the concept "bachelor." Likewise for "triangle" and "has three sides," and so on.
Examples of synthetic propositions, on Kant's definition, include:
"All bachelors are happy."
"All creatures with hearts have kidneys."
Kant's own example is:
"All bodies are heavy," i.e. have mass. (A7/B11)
As with the examples of analytic propositions, each of these is an affirmative subject-predicate judgment. However, in none of these cases does the subject concept contain the predicate concept. The concept "bachelor" does not contain the concept "happy"; "happy" is not a part of the definition of "bachelor." The same is true for "creatures with hearts" and "have kidneys" - even if every creature with a heart also has kidneys
FROM WIKIPEDIA
The philosopher Immanuel Kant was the first to use the terms "analytic" and "synthetic" to divide propositions into types. Kant introduces the analytic/synthetic distinction in the Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1998, A6-7/B10-11). There, he restricts his attention to affirmative subject-predicate judgments, and defines "analytic proposition" and "synthetic proposition" as follows:
analytic proposition: a proposition whose predicate concept is contained in its subject concept
synthetic proposition: a proposition whose predicate concept is not contained in its subject concept
Examples of analytic propositions, on Kant's definition, include:
"All bachelors are unmarried."
"All triangles have three sides."
Kant's own example is:
"All bodies are extended," i.e. take up space. (A7/B11)
Each of these is an affirmative subject-predicate judgment, and in each, the predicate concept is contained with the subject concept. The concept "bachelor" contains the concepts "unmarried"; the concept "unmarried" is part of the definition of the concept "bachelor." Likewise for "triangle" and "has three sides," and so on.
Examples of synthetic propositions, on Kant's definition, include:
"All bachelors are happy."
"All creatures with hearts have kidneys."
Kant's own example is:
"All bodies are heavy," i.e. have mass. (A7/B11)
As with the examples of analytic propositions, each of these is an affirmative subject-predicate judgment. However, in none of these cases does the subject concept contain the predicate concept. The concept "bachelor" does not contain the concept "happy"; "happy" is not a part of the definition of "bachelor." The same is true for "creatures with hearts" and "have kidneys" - even if every creature with a heart also has kidneys
FROM WIKIPEDIA
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Unsu...
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Mon, September 28, 2009 - 6:43 PM"Conceptual containment"? I bore of you. -
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Mon, September 28, 2009 - 6:45 PMKant sayz
thoze pants
make yer
butt
look
fat!!!
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Mon, September 28, 2009 - 6:49 PMImagine there is a circular plane in front of you. A triangle begins to emerge from it, but directly edge-on. You see a point first, the vertex of an angle. Then two lines diverging.
Batchelor may mean unmarried, but it does not mean virginal.
Do all creatures with hearts have kidneys?
If all bodies have mass, then some other body has more mass, in order to retain smaller bodies.
Why, when batchelor specifically may have the connotation of unhitched, would it follow that it means unhappy? -
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Mon, September 28, 2009 - 6:50 PMOOOooooooOOOOOoooooOOOOOOoooooooo.
-
Unsu...
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Mon, September 28, 2009 - 7:26 PM -
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 2:12 PM"Conceptual Containment"... heh... go ahead, blow that wad in your shorts. Dr. Diarrhea might be able to help you. -
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 4:56 PMDon't be making vulgar statements about a great philosopher like Immanuel Kant , Andrew . -
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 5:01 PMFuck off Daddy. Let's go to the courthouse and get my adoption of you finalized. I guess someone will have to supposrt you in your old age.
God knows what a mentally weak fuckwad you are.
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 5:04 PMAnal sex on Sex in the City. You are just as vulgar as me. I don't mention sexual acts in every post. You do. Shut up, I'm trying to get to sleep. And quite moving so much, this bed is old and rickety. Just watch Chelsea Lately, I have cramps and I don't want to give you a blowjob. It's my time of the month. It's my birthday and you are still an asshole to me. Why did I ever fuck you, you have no sense of humor. I want a divorce. And no, you're not my Daddy. I'm gonna burn down the house, you asshole. -
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 5:22 PMI can hear Hummingbird laughing, and I think that josh guy is still reading this. Could be wrong though. -
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 5:23 PM -
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 5:26 PM -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 5:44 PMI say as far as containment goes, if you Kant suck it, just hold it in your mouth until the swelling goes down.... -
-
Re: Conceptual Containment And Kant
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 7:05 PMFuck Yer Day.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-